---
url: https://gaojian.site/ielts-writing/81-essay-2.md
description: Task 2写作训练：游客票价：税收贡献与旅游收益。看懂题目，读熟表达，回忆后换题使用。
---

# 正文 74｜游客票价：税收贡献与旅游收益

## 本节题目

> Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

## 读熟范文，理解选择

### 参考回答

It is sometimes suggested that foreign tourists should be charged higher entrance fees than local residents when visiting cultural and historical attractions. However, I completely disagree with this notion.

One argument in favor of imposing higher prices on international visitors is that many cultural and historical sites rely on government subsidies for maintenance, meaning that local taxpayers already contribute to their upkeep. While this may seem reasonable, I believe it is a narrow-sighted approach. Foreign tourists significantly boost the host country’s economy through their spending on accommodation, food, transport, and souvenirs. Their contributions extend far beyond entrance fees, making them valuable to the overall financial ecosystem. Instead of viewing them as a financial burden, governments should appreciate their economic input and ensure that cultural sites remain accessible to all visitors.

Additionally, imposing higher charges on international tourists could deter them from visiting certain destinations. If travelers perceive a country as unwelcoming due to discriminatory pricing, they may choose alternative destinations where they feel more valued. For example, a family comparing two holiday destinations may choose the one where visiting cultural attractions is more affordable. Equal admission charges can help visitors feel welcome and encourage them to explore more of the local heritage. Conversely, if foreign visitors were subjected to higher fees, the tourism sector could suffer, potentially leading to a decline in revenue and fewer resources for site preservation.

In conclusion, maintaining equal entrance fees for both local and foreign visitors fosters tourism growth, economic benefits, and cultural appreciation. Introducing discriminatory pricing would likely discourage international tourists and ultimately be counterproductive.

### 中文理解

有人提出，外国游客参观文化和历史景点时，应该比当地居民支付更高的门票费用。但我完全不赞同这种做法。

支持提高外国游客票价的一种理由是，许多文化和历史景点依靠政府补贴进行维护，因此当地纳税人已经为维护这些景点出了钱。这个理由看似合理，但我认为它考虑得不够全面。外国游客在住宿、餐饮、交通和纪念品上的消费，能为接待国的经济带来可观的收益。他们的贡献远不止门票收入，对整个经济都有价值。政府应当看到这些经济贡献，让文化景点向所有游客开放，而不是把外国游客看成财政负担。

此外，向外国游客收取更高费用，可能会让他们不愿前往某些地方。如果游客觉得差别定价让一个国家显得不够友好，就可能选择更让自己感到受欢迎的目的地。例如，一个家庭在比较两个度假目的地时，可能会选择参观文化景点更实惠的那一个。统一的门票价格能让游客感到受欢迎，也鼓励他们多了解当地的文化遗产。反过来，如果外国游客被要求支付更高票价，旅游业可能受到影响，收入随之下降，景点保护能获得的资金也可能减少。

总之，对本地和外国游客实行相同票价，有助于旅游业发展、经济增长和文化交流。实行差别定价，很可能让外国游客望而却步，最终适得其反。

### 逻辑链

* 引言｜明确反对差别票价：先交代提议 → 明确完全不赞同，不把讨论换成景点是否收费。

* 主体一｜承认税收理由，再补遗漏：本地人已通过税收贡献 → 但外国游客也带来住宿、餐饮等收入 → 不能只按门票衡量贡献。

* 主体二｜解释高票价的反作用：差别定价 → 游客感觉不受欢迎 → 改选目的地 → 收入与保护资金可能下降。

* 结论｜重申统一票价的判断：相同票价有利于接待与收入 → 差别票价可能适得其反。

### 本题词伙

* **entrance fees**：门票费用；charge / pay entrance fees，写收费的对象时加 for 或 to enter。

* **local taxpayers**：当地纳税人；taxpayers 指纳税者，不是所有游客。

* **financial burden**：经济负担；a financial burden on someone，说明由谁承担。

* **site preservation**：景点保护；与 funding、resources for 连用，将门票政策连接到保护工作。

* **admission charges**：入场收费；与 entrance fees 可在本情境替换，保留收费这一含义。

### 替换与拓展

* **discourage visitors**：让游客却步

  Higher charges may discourage visitors from exploring smaller museums.

* **cover maintenance costs**：承担维护费用

  Admission fees can help cover maintenance costs.

* **offer discounted admission**：提供优惠门票

  Museums could offer discounted admission to students.

### 句型语法

* **用 if 建立可解释的后果**：if 从句用现在时描述可能出现的情况，主句 may 保留不确定性。不是断言所有游客都会离开，而是解释一条决策路径。

  原句：If travelers perceive a country as unwelcoming due to discriminatory pricing, they may choose alternative destinations where they feel more valued.

  结构：If + 现在时, 主语 + may + 动词.

  迁移：If evening buses are unreliable, commuters may choose to drive.

  如果晚间公交不可靠，通勤者可能会选择开车。

* **用 instead of + -ing 提出替代做法**：不是单独批评原做法，而是给出更合适的认识和行动。of 后接名词或 -ing，不接动词原形。

  原句：Instead of viewing them as a financial burden, governments should appreciate their economic input and ensure that cultural sites remain accessible to all visitors.

  结构：Instead of + -ing, 主语 + should + 动词.

  迁移：Instead of replacing every old building, cities should preserve those with cultural value.

  城市不应把所有旧建筑都拆掉，而应保留有文化价值的建筑。

* **用情态动词与搭配限定结果**：could 表示可能的负面影响，deter someone from doing 表达让人不愿做某事。写政策后果时，说明具体被阻碍的行动。

  原句：Additionally, imposing higher charges on international tourists could deter them from visiting certain destinations.

  结构：… could deter + 人 + from + -ing.

  迁移：High course fees could deter adults from returning to education.

  高额学费可能让成年人不愿重返校园。

## 选择与组织 · 为什么这样写

### 把题目要求拆清楚

判断外国游客是否应付更高票价；需要比较支持差别收费的理由与反对理由。

### 怎样组织段落

承认本地税收贡献→游客经济贡献→价格对选择的影响。

### 为什么这样选择

反驳当地纳税者论点要解释游客的其他贡献，而不是简单说收费不公平。

## 语言与精度 · 本节重点

不编造景点收费政策；用合理的情境例子即可。

## 最后练一练 · 先组织，再写

读熟后，可以先遮住参考，回忆本节最有用的两三句。想动笔时再打开下方写作台，不需要首次学习就完成全文。

### 定点练习

写一条不依赖虚构统计的旅游例子。

::: details 写完后看一种参考处理

> A family choosing between destinations may prefer the one where cultural attractions are more affordable.

检查它修正了什么意义或关系。可以使用不同措辞，但信息需要准确。

:::

### 换题使用

**本站自编迁移题**

自编题：Should non-residents pay higher fees to use public leisure centres? 先解释支持方理由，再回应它。

先试一段，再视需要写全文。将新内容写在写作台的“迁移”中；原稿留在“初稿”，修订另存到“修改”。图表题需要重新识别特征，书信与议论文需要重新回应任务。

::: details 打开写作台 · 短练、全文与复盘

> Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

全文练习至少250词，约40分钟；本节短练可以先写一个主体段。

**留一个复盘**：我能回忆哪组表达？换了内容后，哪一句还不熟？下一次先检查这个问题。

:::