---
url: https://gaojian.site/ielts-writing/78-essay-6.md
description: Task 2写作训练：艺术资助：公共与替代资金各有用途。看懂题目，读熟表达，回忆后换题使用。
---

# 正文 71｜艺术资助：公共与替代资金各有用途

## 本节题目

> Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

## 读熟范文，理解选择

### 参考回答

People hold varying opinions regarding the funding of creative artists. While some argue that government financial support for artists is unnecessary, I believe that a combination of government and private funding is essential for the sustainability and growth of the arts.

There are several reasons why government support for artists is crucial. Many art projects, especially those that are displayed in public spaces, serve a significant cultural and educational purpose. For example, in cities like Liverpool, newly installed statues and sculptures in redeveloped areas not only enhance the visual appeal of the city but also reflect its heritage and history. Such artworks become landmarks that educate residents and tourists about the city’s identity. Without government funding, it would be difficult for artists to create these public pieces, which are important to the cultural landscape. Moreover, governments have a responsibility to promote the arts as part of the nation's cultural development, which benefits society as a whole.

However, there are valid concerns regarding government funding for artists. Critics argue that in a world with limited resources, governments should prioritize essential public services such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure over the arts. These services are fundamental to the well-being of citizens, whereas the arts are seen by some as a luxury. Additionally, it is argued that artists should not rely on public money but instead earn their living through the sale of their work, much like any other professional. This would encourage a more self-sustaining arts community.

In my opinion, while the need for alternative funding sources is undeniable, government support should still play a role. A balanced approach, where the government funds projects that provide cultural value to society, while artists also seek financial support from private sources, would ensure the continued flourishing of the arts.

In conclusion, although there are compelling reasons to explore alternative funding methods for creative artists, I believe that government funding is sometimes necessary, particularly when art serves the public good.

### 中文理解

对于创作型艺术家应当从哪里获得资金，人们有不同看法。有人认为政府不必资助艺术家，但我认为，公共资金和私人资金相结合，对艺术的持续发展与成长十分重要。

政府资助艺术家之所以重要，有几个原因。许多艺术项目，尤其是公共空间中的作品，具有重要的文化和教育意义。例如，在利物浦等城市，改造后的城区中新增的雕像和雕塑，不仅让城市更美观，也展现了当地的历史与文化传承。这些作品成为地标，帮助居民和游客了解城市的文化特色。如果没有政府资助，艺术家很难创作这些对城市文化环境十分重要的公共作品。而且，政府有责任把艺术推广作为国家文化发展的一部分，让整个社会从中受益。

不过，人们对政府资助艺术家的担忧也有道理。反对者认为，资源有限，政府应优先支持教育、医疗和基础设施等必要的公共服务，而不是艺术。这些服务是居民生活的基本保障，而有些人把艺术看作一种额外享受。此外，也有人认为，艺术家应像其他职业从业者一样，通过出售作品谋生，而不是依靠公共资金。这会鼓励艺术界更多地依靠自身收入来维持发展。

我认为，寻找其他资金来源当然有必要，但政府资助仍应发挥作用。政府资助具有社会文化价值的项目，同时艺术家也主动寻求私人资金支持，这种平衡的做法能让艺术持续发展。

总之，艺术家寻求其他资助方式有充分的理由，但我认为政府资金有时仍不可缺少，尤其是在艺术服务于公共利益的时候。

### 逻辑链

* 引言｜表态结合公共与私人资助：并非只有政府或只有市场 → 主张两种来源结合。

* 主体一｜公共艺术的社会价值：公共作品美化城市、体现历史 → 居民游客受益 → 公共资金有作用。

* 主体二｜说明替代资助的理由：资源有限 → 公共服务优先；出售作品谋生 → 促进艺术界自我维持。

* 个人判断｜资金按项目价值配置：公共价值项目由政府参与 → 艺术家同时寻找私人支持 → 形成平衡。

* 结论｜保留有范围的政府支持：其他来源重要 → 服务公共利益的艺术仍可能需要政府资金。

### 本题词伙

* **government funding**：政府资助；receive / provide government funding，funding 通常不可数。

* **public spaces**：公共空间；artworks in public spaces，注意 in 的位置表达。

* **essential public services**：必要公共服务；prioritise essential public services，配合具体项目。

* **earn their living**：谋生；earn a living through / by，说明收入来源。

* **the public good**：公共利益；serve the public good，比把 good 用作商品名称更准确。

### 替换与拓展

* **seek private sponsorship**：寻求私人赞助

  Artists could seek private sponsorship for exhibitions.

* **allocate public funds**：分配公共资金

  Councils should allocate public funds according to community needs.

* **preserve cultural heritage**：保护文化遗产

  Some projects help preserve cultural heritage.

### 句型语法

* **用 without 引出假设中的困难**：would be difficult 描述缺少资助时可能遇到的困难，不是宣称所有项目都无法自立。随后 which 补充公共作品的意义。

  原句：Without government funding, it would be difficult for artists to create these public pieces, which are important to the cultural landscape.

  结构：Without + 名词, it would be difficult to…

  迁移：Without reliable transport, it would be difficult for some residents to attend evening classes.

  没有可靠的交通，有些居民就很难参加晚间课程。

* **用 not only… but also… 并列两种价值**：两边的动词 enhance 与 reflect 并列：一个写城市外观，一个写历史文化。并列的内容应当分别提供有效信息。

  原句：For example, in cities like Liverpool, newly installed statues and sculptures in redeveloped areas not only enhance the visual appeal of the city but also reflect its heritage and history.

  结构：… not only + 动词 A, but also + 动词 B.

  迁移：Community events not only bring neighbours together but also introduce newcomers to local traditions.

  社区活动不仅能让邻里相聚，也能让新居民了解当地传统。

* **用补充从句解释平衡方案**：where 解释 a balanced approach 的具体安排；主句 would ensure 说明设想的结果。重点是把“平衡”写成可理解的做法。

  原句：A balanced approach, where the government funds projects that provide cultural value to society, while artists also seek financial support from private sources, would ensure the continued flourishing of the arts.

  结构：An approach where A…, while B…, would…

  迁移：An approach where schools provide guidance while students choose their projects would encourage responsibility.

  学校提供指导、学生自主选择项目的做法，有助于培养责任感。

## 选择与组织 · 为什么这样写

### 把题目要求拆清楚

讨论政府资助与其他来源；个人观点可以按项目性质分配。

### 怎样组织段落

公共文化收益→预算机会成本与商业收入→公共价值项目和市场项目分开。

### 为什么这样选择

只论证政府资金不足还不等于解释替代来源；指出销售、赞助等来源怎样运作。

## 语言与精度 · 本节重点

public funding、private sponsorship与ticket revenue区分来源；不把所有艺术都说成奢侈品。

## 最后练一练 · 先组织，再写

读熟后，可以先遮住参考，回忆本节最有用的两三句。想动笔时再打开下方写作台，不需要首次学习就完成全文。

### 定点练习

写一句有条件的资金分工。

::: details 写完后看一种参考处理

> Public funding may be justified for projects with clear cultural benefits, while commercially viable work can also attract private sponsorship.

检查它修正了什么意义或关系。可以使用不同措辞，但信息需要准确。

:::

### 换题使用

**本站自编迁移题**

自编题：Should sporting events receive government funding or rely on private sponsors? 写一套按公共收益分配资金的判断。

先试一段，再视需要写全文。将新内容写在写作台的“迁移”中；原稿留在“初稿”，修订另存到“修改”。图表题需要重新识别特征，书信与议论文需要重新回应任务。

::: details 打开写作台 · 短练、全文与复盘

> Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

全文练习至少250词，约40分钟；本节短练可以先写一个主体段。

**留一个复盘**：我能回忆哪组表达？换了内容后，哪一句还不熟？下一次先检查这个问题。

:::